The Supreme Court recently expressed disapproval of lawyers relying on AI tools to file submissions that cited non-existent or fabricated judgments. Even so, readers are rarely told when a machine has played a meaningful role in shaping what they read. As more writers lean on the same dominant systems, trained largely on Western language corpora, writing risks losing local texture and rhythm. The reader does not need technical detail, but they deserve clarity about whether the voice they engage with is entirely human. The question is whether writers choose honesty over convenience and whether readers are given the courtesy of knowing how words were put together.

Source: Indian Express March 05, 2026 10:27 UTC