Mark Lundy, pictured moments before he was found guilty a second time, should have been granted a third trial, writes Jimmy Ellingham. READ MORE:* Mark Lundy to stay in prison after Supreme Court declines appeal* The Lundy murders: 18 years of legal battles and police work because of a dirty polo shirt* Lundy a victim of 'junk science', lawyer says in bid for Supreme Court appealSUPPLIED Lundy has twice been found guilty of murdering his wife Christine and their 7-year-old daughter Amber. KEVIN STENT/STUFF The Supreme Court did not agree with Lundy's lawyer, Jonathan Eaton, QC, that Lundy should be granted a third trial. France told jurors the Crown case did not rest on MRNA and the Supreme Court said this was made clear. The Supreme Court also found the MRNA evidence was subject to intense defence expert criticism, something jurors could have considered.

Source: Stuff December 21, 2019 00:33 UTC