The authors concluded that recusal rules provide a way out, and they examined when and under what conditions judges should take advantage of them. Sign Up You agree to receive occasional updates and special offers for The New York Times's products and services. It wouldn’t have been unreasonable for lawmakers to press Mr. Vought to ensure that he wouldn’t discriminate against Muslims while serving in government. Taken to its logical conclusion, that would mean any strong expression of theological conviction is unwelcome in the public square. Even the remnants of the other side, in people’s minds and consciences, must submit to maximalist progressive claims.

Source: New York Times September 11, 2017 07:21 UTC