It is unclear whether Robredo’s call for an immediate investigation into the supposed “collusion” was tackled during Tuesday’s en banc session. ‘Eerily similar’ motionsCalida filed his separate motion for inhibition mere hours after Marcos filed his. Robredo’s lawyers said the two separate and unrelated motions are “eerily similar.”The OSG’s motion raised almost the similar arguments with the one filed by Marcos. “Protestant Marcos is already represented by one of the known election lawyers of high caliber. He does not need to be lullabied and spoiled further by [Calida] and a buildingful of tax-paid state solicitors,” they said.

Source: Philippine Star November 18, 2020 04:07 UTC