Prawit has yet submit a letter of explanation to the NACC, but there are three possible ways for Prawit to explain the issue. First, the items belong to him but he acquired them after declaring his assets to NACC in 2014 when he took office. The question has to be asked: Is it reasonable that Prawit, who declared a total of Bt87 million in assets to the NACC, bought the jewellery? Is there anybody, in the entire world, who would lend someone else a watch of such value? Regardless of what explanation Prawit chooses, there will inevitably be one more question: Will he be able to convince the NACC?

Source: The Nation Bangkok December 14, 2017 03:00 UTC