No reasonable expectation of privacy for Aaron Smith - lawyerHAMISH MCNEILLY/FAIRFAX NZ Aaron Smith's privacy wasn't breached by the witnesses at Christchurch Airport but that doesn't mean making a video was the correct choice - experts. * New Zealand Rugby and Aaron Smith yet to set date for misconduct hearing* Aaron Smith: Star halfback leaves All Blacks tour in disgrace after airport toilet tryst* Full witness account of Aaron Smith's airport bathroom toilet incident* Disgraced All Black Aaron Smith speaks for first time after toilet scandal* Aaron Smith: New Zealand has mixed reaction to All Black's bathroom indiscretionThe couple have not released the video but they did report what they saw and heard to the media. GETTY While Smith did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy, the same rules do not apply to the woman involved, a Victoria University law professor says. NO REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF PRIVACYChristchurch lawyer Kathryn Dalziel said she did not believe Smith and the woman had a reasonable expectation of privacy. Dalziel said there would be a better case for a reasonable expectation of privacy if Smith was actually going to the toilet, vomiting or washing his face.

Source: Stuff October 11, 2016 23:49 UTC