I think its actually good to see the one in charge being held responsible for lack of effort of his department. Hopefully this is the start of holding the top dogs responsible when they do not follow through. seajaeIf you need Article 44 to do it, then this is not an option for civilian governments, as they do not have those powers. If they were bothered about holding top dogs responsible, there is a certain interior minister who needs looking at. The abrupt sacking using Article 44 robbed that individual of the due diligence process.

Source: The Nation Bangkok November 03, 2017 18:11 UTC