more-inThe Justice Arumughaswamy Commission of Inquiry has taken a dim view of the fact that V.K. Dhinakaran instead of submitting it as evidence to the Commission. “After the notification, she ought to have filed the affidavit before the Commission at the first instance itself,” said the order. Justice Arumughaswamy said that Sasikala’s refusal to file an affidavit had affected the Commission’s proceedings. “The handicap of the Commission is, that after publication of the notice the petitioner has not filed any sworn affidavit before the panel even after notice from the Commission.

Source: The Hindu January 30, 2018 19:52 UTC