Roger Federer, who has begun his 19th campaign for the Wimbledon title, would have been a subject of commentary alone (“Did you see that”, “Genius”, “What a beauty”) if it were not for some qualities that have attracted the attention of literature (“Roger Federer As Religious Experience”). He borrowed the term from a bus driver whose analysis of Federer’s game was “bloody near-religious experience”. Also, even though nobody refers to Federer’s beauty as feminine, its arch-villains are usually depicted as manly things. Tennis, as it is an individual game (so is cricket, but that argument another day), does not convey obvious management lessons—especially Roger Federer’s game. Like Roger Federer’s backhand.

Source: Mint June 30, 2017 06:56 UTC