All India Muslim Personal Law Board senior member MP Asaduddin Owaisi after the meeting of boards working committee on the Supreme Court verdict on Ayodhya dispute, in Lucknow, Sunday, November 17, 2019. Parande added that similar disputes about religious sites in Varanasi and Mathura were not on the VHP’s agenda. “As the court’s decision on the Ramjanmabhoomi is unanimous, I think there is no need for a review petition,” Parande said. However, on Wednesday, the VHP had not shown similar deference for the judgment, declaring that it would not allow the alternative mosque that the Supreme Court has provided for to come up within “the cultural boundary” of Ayodhya. Also, wherever the new mosque is built in India, it cannot be named after Babar, VHP international patron and RSS pracharak Dinesh Chandra had said in Ayodhya.

Source: The Telegraph November 17, 2019 22:50 UTC