The six served in the university in the period between 2006 and 2017 in different senior positions in administration, human resource, marketing, student welfare and accounting. They are asking for Justice Byram Ongaya's intervention to compel the university to revoke their termination and disclose the criteria used to determine which employees would lose their jobs. ALSO READ: Relief for sacked water board CEO as court reinstates him"The university did not undertake a proper evaluation and assessment of the job environment before arriving at the decision. "The decision is informed by other considerations other than our services being redundant," they said in court through lawyer Lucy Kairuthi. But the affected employees are against losing their jobs on account that the process was flawed and unprocedural.

Source: Standard Digital June 12, 2017 09:45 UTC