Sovereignty: The administration argues that these organizations have morphed into a “ sprawling architecture of global governance ” that constrains U.S. domestic policy. By leaving, they aim to remove the “ international obligation ” often used to justify domestic regulations (particularly environmental ones) [1] . ImplicationsGeopolitical Vacuum: The exit leaves a massive leadership void in critical areas like climate science (IPCC), renewable energy ( International Solar Alliance ), and counterterrorism. Diplomatic Isolation: The U.S. becomes the only nation outside the UNFCCC (the bedrock of climate diplomacy), isolating it from global decision-making tables . Leaving bodies like the IPCC and the International Renewable Energy Agency detaches the U.S. from the primary for scientific data sharing and energy .

Source: Indian Express January 18, 2026 13:51 UTC