According to the New York Times, "investigators wrote that they had received ‘multiple reports’ about a network employee who was ‘on call’ to perform oral sex on Mr. In fact, in his interview with the investigators, Moonves admitted to having oral sex with the woman "on call" but said it was "consensual." They willingly and without complaint, as far as Mr. Moonves might have known, responded to his requests for oral sex. Can Moonves legitimately argue that the absence of any sort of "no"—a complaint, a protest, an attempt to run away—means that the relationships were consensual? Doctors don’t kindly request their patients perform oral sex on them.

Source: Forbes January 21, 2019 00:00 UTC