Parties in Jammu: Article 35A ‘unconstitutional’, ‘stifling’ - News Summed Up

Parties in Jammu: Article 35A ‘unconstitutional’, ‘stifling’


(Representational image) The Jammu Chamber of Commerce also did not see anything wrong in Article 35 A being repealed. (Representational image)In the middle of debate on Article 35A, which allows Jammu and Kashmir to define its “permanent residents”, the constitutional provision seems to have few takers among political parties and other organisations in Jammu. Jammu and Kashmir National Panthers Party chairperson Harsh Dev Singh described Article 35A as unconstitutional. The BJP, which is in power in the state in alliance with the PDP, also did not support Article 35A. “It has done damage to the state and the Indian nation,’’ said state BJP spokesperson Sunil Sethi.


Source: Indian Express August 13, 2017 00:45 UTC



Loading...
Loading...
  

Loading...