“The hearsay now relied upon by the applicants is so vague and unreliable as to be of zero probative value.”Speer, the widow of Sgt. In response, Whitling argues no evidence of any “nefarious activity” by Khadr has been shown and his client has nothing to answer for. Ultimately, he argues the American applicants have fallen well short of meeting the requirements for an injunction. The Utah judgment was almost entirely dependent on Khadr’s confession to having killed Speer. Khadr never defended against the Utah case — he was in jail in Canada serving out the sentence handed him by the commission.

Source: National Post July 13, 2017 04:07 UTC