"Salve showed that Pakistan had granted conditional access to Jadhav by linking this case to an unrelated issue. Only one fact could be correct, either access to Jadhav could be granted, conditional or otherwise, or it was barred. Both cannot be true," a source said.When India expressed concern over Jadhav's impending execution, Pakistan's counsel argued that it was a red herring as the law provided for 150 days clemency period for any condemned prisoner in the country, the source said. "Salve asked how there could be any confusion about Jadhav's identity," the source said.Instead of squarely addressing the points made by India, Pakistan attempted to project before the international court that it was a victim of India-sponsored terrorism. "But the ICJ benchcontaining Jadhav's alleged confessional statement," the source said.

Source: Times of India May 16, 2017 22:41 UTC