Judge Gillani concurred with his fellow judges on only one point: That the ICJ, variously also referred to as the UN court or world court, has jurisdiction to hear India’s plea against Pakistan over Kulbhushan Jadhav. Also read: Review death sentence to Kulbhushan Jadhav, UN court orders PakistanOn each of the seven other points on which the ICJ ruled by a 15:1 majority, Judge Gillani was consistently the dissenting judge. ICJ concluded that Pakistan breached its obligations under the Vienna convention by not informing Mr Kulbhushan Sudhir Jadhav of his rights to consular access under this pact. WATCH | Kulbhushan Jadhav verdict: ICJ rules in favour of India, Jadhav to get consular accessAlso read: Kulbhushan Jadhav verdict by UN Court explained in 5 points3. The ICJ declared that “a continued stay of execution constitutes an indispensable condition for the effective review and reconsideration of the conviction and sentence of Mr. Kulbhushan Sudhir Jadhav”.

Source: Hindustan Times July 17, 2019 13:57 UTC