As states come up with innovative solutions to their health care problems, it means there are 50 opportunities to experiment. Any national health care system that assumes one party will control Washington for all eternity is doomed to fail. From the perspective of somebody who wants to see genuine federalism in health care, Graham-Cassidy leaves a lot to be desired. Under one scenario, for instance, Texans could be subsidizing single-payer health care in Vermont. Advertisement Continue reading the main storyBut the idea of giving states more control over their health care systems should survive no matter what happens with Graham-Cassidy.

Source: New York Times September 20, 2017 18:56 UTC