EDSA ‘86 revisionism, fallacies - News Summed Up
EDSA ‘86 revisionism, fallacies

EDSA ‘86 revisionism, fallacies

March 01, 2018 16:07 UTC

Trending Today


EDSA ‘86 revisionism, fallacies


The Supreme Court may say my intent in the legislative arena meant nothing. All of us who have war stories of EDSA ‘86, whose 32nd anniversary we just marked, have validated what the spouses Durants wrote: all autobiography is vanity. Has EDSA ‘86 failed? After what’s going on, will we have the same Supreme Court, or stronger, or weaker (given Digong’s transparent interest in removing someone who has crossed him)? In January 1987, I, 47, turned down a signed Supreme Court appointment.


Source: Manila Times March 01, 2018 16:07 UTC



Loading...
Loading...
  

Loading...

                           
/* -------------------------- overlay advertisemnt -------------------------- */