Differences between Cardinal Pell's prosecution and defense - News Summed Up

Differences between Cardinal Pell's prosecution and defense


The defense said it was impossible for the crimes to have gone unnoticed in the busy cathedral moments after masses. The prosecution also said Pell did not always spend time conversing with parishioners on the cathedral steps after mass. The defense accused the complainant of altering his evidence in later testimony after discovering that the garments did not open along the middle. The defense points to Sacristan Max Potter's evidence that the wine was always locked in a sacristy safe after Sunday Solemn Mass. The prosecution says as a 13 year-old boy, the complainant could be expected to be inexperienced in varieties of wine.


Source: Fox News February 26, 2019 02:15 UTC



Loading...
Loading...
  

Loading...

                           
/* -------------------------- overlay advertisemnt -------------------------- */