At a minimum, the article is substantially true, and as such, Page did not state a claim for defamation based on that article. Page also fails to state a claim for defamation with respect to the remaining articles. “I also disagree with the majority that the Isikoff article was substantially true,” she wrote in her dissenting opinion. In a separate ruling related to the case, justices ruled in favor of one-time Trump lawyer Lin Wood, who tried to join Page’s legal team as an out-of-state guest attorney. The Supreme Court determined a lower court wrongly kept Wood from joining Page’s team.

Source: Huffington Post January 20, 2022 21:05 UTC