The Commission, in its decision, held that Totobi Quakyi had not necessarily violated the law on asset declaration, Article 287 of the 1992 Constitution, which mandates it to take action against public officials who violate the law. CHRAJ explained that although the Board Chairman had not filed his asset declaration form at the time the petition was filed, he subsequently did. “As noted supra, this later declaration was made during the pendency of the Complaint brought against the Respondent. CHRAJ also held that the board chairman was not able to justify his reason for not declaring his assets before the petition was filed. The Commission, therefore, recommended that Totobi Quakyi should only be rebuked.

Source: GhanaWeb February 17, 2026 12:08 UTC