Aileen Cannon has frothed up the usual suspects with her latest order, in which she suggests that Jack Smith is being inconsistent about his approach to grand jury secrecy. 267–268, 294, 350, 369, 511 (opposing public disclosure of potential witness names, ancillary names, and grand jury matters); see ECF Nos. [links added]Ultimately, this is a complaint from Aileen Cannon that she made Stan Woodward look bad. First, Jack Smith overproduced discovery to Donald Trump and his co-defendants compared to normal defendants, providing most grand jury transcripts from the start, rather than in conjunction with and timed to select witnesses testifying. These are grand jury proceedings about the investigation, not grand jury testimony of witnesses (though it describes the circumstances of certain witness testimony, including Margo Martin and Kash Patel).

Source: New York Times May 20, 2024 14:57 UTC