AINGENS has released findings from a pilot clinical reliability assessment of MACg, demonstrating zero hallucinations and 100% accuracy across 75 questions spanning five clinical trial publications. The results show that well-designed, evidence-first workflows can substantially reduce hallucination risk when using AI to extract and summarize clinical trial data for medical and scientific content. "The issue isn't whether AI hallucinations exist. In this 75-question evaluation of clinical trial data extraction tasks, MACg showed zero hallucinations and 100% accuracy for requested numerical and categorical data elements across five peer-reviewed clinical trial publications. The findings suggest that well-designed, document-grounded workflows can substantially reduce hallucination risk in structured clinical data extraction tasks.

Source: New York Times March 02, 2026 13:38 UTC