CUP said it complied so that the larger body of its academic and educational materials could remain available in China. CUP said it complied so that the larger body of its academic and educational materials could remain available in China. CUP said it complied so that the larger body of its academic and educational materials could remain available in China. But critics argue that the publisher had undermined the principles of academic freedom and independence and lent its name to China’s censorship efforts. “The result is a misleading, neutered simulacrum of China Quarterly for the China market,” he wrote.

Source: Indian Express August 21, 2017 02:44 UTC