| Published Tue, November 21st 2017 at 09:12, Updated November 21st 2017 at 09:19 GMT +3Supreme Court judges during the hearing of petitions challenging President Uhuru Kenyatta's win. Elaborate strategy“IEBC did not cancel election in those areas but postponed to allow the situation to calm down. They succeeded in locking out National Super Alliance and frustrated the human rights activists request to audit IEBC election materials, including forms 34A and 34B. The final key question was whether the election was done in accordance with the Constitution and applicable electoral laws. Both IEBC and Uhuru convinced the judges that the repeat presidential polls was free, fair, credible and was a true reflection of the people’s will despite the low turnout witnessed during voting.

Source: Standard Digital November 21, 2017 06:11 UTC