The foundation argues that the court is overstepping its authority, asserting that no criminal case or legal action currently exists to justify such a demand. The dispute centers on a Writ of Subpoena Duces Tecum issued at the request of the Asset Recovery and Property Retrieval Task Force, led by Cllr. However, in a motion to quash filed through General Manager Jackson P. Gbamie, the foundation contends the writ is a legal nullity. Because there is no civil action, criminal indictment, or formal petition currently filed against the foundation in Criminal Court ‘A’, the organization argues the court lacks the subject-matter jurisdiction to enforce the order. Constitutional and Due Process ConcernsBeyond procedural technicalities, the Clar Hope Foundation raised a significant constitutional objection.
